Maintaining Impartiality: Why Court Employees Must Avoid Financial Dealings with Litigants

n

A.M. No. P-96-1218 (Formerly OCA I.P.I. No. 96-147-P), September 04, 1996

n

Imagine needing to appear in court. You expect a fair and impartial process. But what if a court employee is also trying to sell you jewelry, creating a financial relationship that could influence their actions? This scenario highlights the critical importance of ethical conduct for those working within the justice system. The case of Abergas v. Bagolbagol underscores why court employees must avoid situations where personal financial interests clash with their professional duties, potentially undermining public trust in the judiciary.

nn

The Duty of Impartiality in Public Service

n

The Philippine legal system emphasizes impartiality and integrity, especially for those working within the courts. This isn’t just a suggestion; it’s a fundamental requirement for maintaining public trust. The Code of Conduct for Court Personnel directly addresses this, outlining the standards expected of every employee, from judges to court stenographers.

n

At its core, this principle aims to prevent situations where personal gain could compromise an employee’s judgment or create the appearance of impropriety. It’s not enough to be honest; court personnel must also avoid any behavior that could be perceived as biased or unfair.

n

For instance, if a court clerk accepts a gift from a party involved in a case, even if it seems small, it can raise questions about whether the clerk will treat that party more favorably. Similarly, engaging in business dealings with litigants, as seen in Abergas v. Bagolbagol, creates a conflict of interest that can erode public confidence in the judicial process. The Supreme Court has consistently emphasized that court employees must maintain a high standard of ethical conduct to preserve the integrity of the courts.

n

Relevant provisions emphasize the need for public servants to avoid financial dealings that could interfere with their duties. These provisions are in place to protect the integrity of the judicial system and ensure that justice is administered fairly and impartially.

nn

The Case of Abergas v. Bagolbagol: A Conflict of Interest

n

Erlinda Abergas, a plaintiff in a civil case, filed a complaint against Merlita Bagolbagol, a court stenographer. The core issue? Bagolbagol, after delivering transcripts to Abergas,