Key Takeaway: Oral Sales Can Be Enforceable and Lead to Property Reconveyance

Pascual Purisima, Jr., et al. v. Macaria Purisima, et al., G.R. No. 200484, November 18, 2020

Imagine inheriting a piece of land that you’ve always considered yours, only to discover that a portion of it was sold decades ago by your late relative. This is the scenario faced by the Purisima family, highlighting the complexities of property rights and the enforceability of oral agreements in the Philippines. In the case of Pascual Purisima, Jr., et al. v. Macaria Purisima, et al., the Supreme Court ruled on the validity of an oral sale of land and the subsequent right of the buyer to seek reconveyance, even without a written contract.

The case revolved around a piece of land sold by Pascual Purisima Sr. to his siblings in 1960 to cover medical expenses. The sale was not documented in writing, but the buyers took possession and paid taxes on the property. Years later, when the land was titled under the heirs of Purisima Sr., the buyers sought to have the title reconveyed to them. The central legal question was whether an oral sale of real property could be enforced and lead to reconveyance.

Legal Context: The Statute of Frauds and Property Rights

In the Philippines, the Statute of Frauds, as outlined in Article 1403 of the Civil Code, generally requires certain contracts, including those for the sale of real property, to be in writing to be enforceable. However, this rule applies primarily to executory contracts—those yet to be performed. For contracts that have been fully or partially performed, the Statute of Frauds does not apply.

Consensual Contract: A contract of sale is considered a consensual contract, meaning it is perfected by mere consent. According to Article 1458 of the Civil Code, “By the contract of sale one of the contracting parties obligates himself to transfer the ownership and to deliver a determinate thing, and the other to pay therefor a price certain in money or its equivalent.” This means that the validity of a sale does not necessarily depend on its form but on the agreement and actions of the parties involved.

Reconveyance: Reconveyance is a remedy available to those wrongfully deprived of their property. It is an equitable action to compel the person holding the title to transfer it back to the rightful owner. This is particularly relevant when property has been registered in the name of someone other than the true owner due to fraud or mistake.

For example, if you buy a piece of land from your neighbor and start living on it, paying taxes, and making improvements, but there’s no written contract, you might still have a valid claim to the property if it was later titled under someone else’s name.

Case Breakdown: The Journey of the Purisima Property

In 1960, Pascual Purisima Sr. sold portions of his land to his siblings, Macaria Purisima and the Spouses Erlinda and Daniel Medrano, to cover his medical bills. The sale was not formally documented, but the buyers took possession of the land, paid taxes, and had tenants working on it.

After Purisima Sr.’s death in 1971, his heirs, including Pascual Purisima Jr., executed an Extrajudicial Settlement of Estate in 1978, which included the sale of the properties to the respondents. However, in 1991, Pascual Purisima Jr. obtained a free patent covering the entire lot, including the portions sold to the respondents, and registered it in 1992.

The respondents, upon learning of the registration, repeatedly asked Purisima Jr. to surrender the title for annotation of the sale, but their requests were ignored. They then filed a complaint for reconveyance, cancellation, and quieting of title in 1999.

The Regional Trial Court (RTC) dismissed the complaint, citing the lack of a written sale document. However, the Court of Appeals (CA) reversed this decision, recognizing the validity of the 1960 sale and ordering the reconveyance of the property to the respondents.

The Supreme Court upheld the CA’s decision, stating, “The Statute of Frauds affects merely the enforceability of the contract… But long accepted and well settled is the rule that the Statute of Frauds is applicable only to executory contracts—not to contracts either totally or partially performed.”

Another key quote from the Court’s decision is, “While the certificate of title in favor of defendants-appellees is indefeasible, unassailable and binding against the whole world, including government itself, it does not create or vest title. It merely confirms or records title already existing and vested.”

Practical Implications: Navigating Property Sales and Reconveyance

This ruling underscores the importance of understanding the enforceability of oral agreements in property transactions. Even without a written contract, a sale can be considered valid if it has been fully or partially performed. This means that buyers who have taken possession and acted as owners of the property may have a strong claim to reconveyance if the property is later titled under someone else’s name.

For property owners and buyers, this case highlights the need to document transactions properly to avoid disputes. However, it also offers hope to those who may have relied on oral agreements and can prove partial or full performance.

Key Lessons:

• Document property transactions to avoid disputes, but remember that an oral sale can still be enforceable if fully or partially performed.
• If you are in possession of a property and it is wrongfully titled under someone else’s name, you may have the right to seek reconveyance.
• Understand the difference between executory and consummated contracts to navigate the Statute of Frauds effectively.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can an oral sale of real property be enforced in the Philippines?

Yes, an oral sale can be enforced if it has been fully or partially performed, as it falls outside the Statute of Frauds.

What is reconveyance, and when can it be sought?

Reconveyance is a remedy to compel the transfer of property back to its rightful owner. It can be sought when property has been wrongfully registered in another’s name due to fraud or mistake.

How long do I have to file an action for reconveyance?

If you are in possession of the property, the action for reconveyance is imprescriptible. Otherwise, the prescriptive period is ten years from the issuance of the title.

What should I do if I discover my property is titled under someone else’s name?

Seek legal advice immediately. You may need to file an action for reconveyance to have the title transferred back to you.

Can a certificate of title be challenged?

Yes, a certificate of title can be challenged if it was obtained through fraud or mistake, and reconveyance can be sought to correct the title.

ASG Law specializes in Property Law and Civil Litigation. Contact us or email hello@asglawpartners.com to schedule a consultation.