Bail After Conviction: An Appeal Doesn’t Guarantee Freedom

G.R. No. 114350, January 16, 1997

Imagine being accused of a crime, fighting your case, and finally, the court convicts you of a lesser offense. Does this mean you automatically get to go home while you appeal? Not necessarily. Philippine law carefully balances the right to freedom with the need to ensure justice is served. This case dives into the complexities of bail after conviction, particularly when the original charge was a serious one.

Introduction: The Ferrer Assassination Case

The case of Jose T. Obosa vs. Court of Appeals and People of the Philippines stems from the high-profile assassination of former Secretary of Interior and Local Governments Jaime N. Ferrer and his driver. Obosa was charged with two counts of murder, a capital offense. However, the trial court convicted him of the lesser crime of homicide. This led to the central question: was Obosa entitled to bail while he appealed his homicide conviction, considering he was initially charged with murder?

Legal Context: Understanding Bail in the Philippines

Bail is a security given for the release of a person in custody of the law, furnished by him or a bondsman, conditioned upon his appearance before any court as required under the conditions specified. The right to bail is enshrined in the Philippine Constitution, but it’s not absolute. Section 13, Article III of the 1987 Constitution states:

“Sec. 13. All persons, except those charged with offenses punishable by reclusion perpetua when evidence of guilt is strong, shall, before conviction, be bailable by sufficient sureties, or be released on recognizance as may be provided by law.”

This means that before a final conviction, everyone has the right to bail unless they are charged with a capital offense (punishable by death or reclusion perpetua) and the evidence of guilt is strong. But what happens after conviction?

After conviction by the Regional Trial Court (RTC) of an offense not punishable by death, reclusion perpetua, or life imprisonment, bail becomes a matter of discretion. It’s no longer an automatic right. The court will consider factors like the risk of flight, the possibility of committing another crime, and the accused’s criminal record.

Case Breakdown: Obosa’s Fight for Freedom

Here’s how the Obosa case unfolded:

• The Crime: Jaime Ferrer and his driver were killed in an ambush. Obosa was identified as one of the shooters.
• The Charge: Obosa was charged with two counts of murder.
• The Trial: The trial court found him guilty of the lesser offense of homicide.
• The Bail: The trial court granted Obosa bail pending his appeal.
• The Appeal: The Court of Appeals (CA) cancelled the bail, leading Obosa to petition the Supreme Court.

A key issue was whether the trial court still had jurisdiction to grant bail after Obosa had filed his notice of appeal. The Supreme Court found that the trial court lost jurisdiction when the appeal was perfected.

The Supreme Court quoted from a previous ruling:

“A necessary regard for orderly procedure demands that once a case, whether civil or criminal, has been appealed from a trial court to an appellate court and the appeal therefrom perfected, the court a quo loses jurisdiction over the case, both over the record and over the subject of the case.”

The Court further reasoned that even though Obosa was convicted of homicide, the original murder charge still loomed large. The appeal opened the entire case for review, potentially leading to a conviction for murder. This increased the temptation for Obosa to flee, justifying the denial of bail.

Practical Implications: What This Means for You

This case highlights that a conviction for a lesser offense doesn’t automatically guarantee bail pending appeal, especially if the original charge was a capital crime. The courts will carefully consider the circumstances and the risk of flight. Moreover, the timing of the bail application is crucial; it must be filed and approved while the trial court still has jurisdiction over the case.

Key Lessons:

• Bail after conviction is not a right but a matter of judicial discretion.
• The original charge and the strength of evidence play a significant role.
• Timing is critical; the bail application must be approved before the trial court loses jurisdiction.

Hypothetical Example:

Imagine a person charged with illegal possession of drugs (a bailable offense) but the evidence shows he is also selling drugs. He is only convicted of possession. The court may deny bail pending appeal because the evidence shows he could be selling drugs while his case is pending appeal.

Frequently Asked Questions

Q: What is bail?

A: Bail is a security given to ensure an accused person appears in court.

Q: Is bail a right?

A: Before conviction, yes, unless charged with a capital offense and evidence of guilt is strong. After conviction, it’s discretionary.

Q: What factors do courts consider when granting bail after conviction?

A: Risk of flight, criminal record, potential to commit another crime, and the strength of the evidence.

Q: What happens if I violate the terms of my bail?

A: Your bail will be forfeited, and you will be re-arrested.

Q: Does appealing my conviction guarantee I’ll be granted bail?

A: No, it’s up to the court’s discretion.

Q: What is needed to apply for bail?

A: A motion needs to be filed to the court. The court will set a hearing to determine if bail should be granted.

ASG Law specializes in criminal law. Contact us or email hello@asglawpartners.com to schedule a consultation.