The Importance of Evidence in Allegations of Lawyer Misconduct and Corporate Actions

Gerodias v. Riveral, Pulvera-Page, and Supatan, A.C. No. 12719, February 17, 2021, 897 Phil. 233

Imagine a workplace where a simple request for early retirement turns into a legal battle involving accusations of misconduct and conspiracy. This scenario unfolded in the case of Sanny L. Gerodias against three lawyers from the same law firm, highlighting the complexities of employment disputes and the critical role of evidence in legal proceedings. The central question in this case was whether the actions of the lawyers constituted a violation of the Code of Professional Responsibility (CPR) and whether there was sufficient evidence to support the allegations of misconduct and conspiracy.

Gerodias, a former employee of Oriental Port and Allied Services Corporation (OPASCOR), faced several disciplinary investigations during his tenure. After an incident involving theft, he opted for voluntary retirement instead of facing termination. However, he later filed a disbarment complaint against the President and General Manager of OPASCOR, the Corporate Secretary, and another lawyer from the firm, alleging they conspired to terminate his employment unlawfully.

Legal Context

In the Philippines, the conduct of lawyers is governed by the Code of Professional Responsibility (CPR), which sets the ethical standards they must adhere to. Key provisions relevant to this case include Canon 1, which mandates lawyers to uphold the Constitution and obey the laws of the land, and Rules 1.01, 1.02, and 1.03, which prohibit lawyers from engaging in unlawful, dishonest, or deceitful conduct.

The concept of corporate governance also comes into play, particularly in how corporations manage their internal affairs and authorize actions. Under the Corporation Code of the Philippines, a corporation’s board of directors (BOD) has the authority to make decisions and delegate powers to officers and agents, as outlined in the corporation’s by-laws.

Understanding these principles is crucial for both legal professionals and corporate officers. For instance, a corporate secretary’s role in issuing certificates and representing the company in legal matters must be clearly defined and authorized by the BOD to avoid confusion and potential legal challenges.

Case Breakdown

Sanny L. Gerodias’s journey began with his employment at OPASCOR, where he faced multiple disciplinary issues. The final straw was an incident involving the theft of a box of perfumes, which led to his decision to retire early. Despite not meeting the company’s 15-year service requirement, the President and General Manager, Atty. Tomas A. Riveral, approved his request.

After receiving his retirement pay, Gerodias filed a complaint for illegal dismissal and sought a breakdown of deductions. OPASCOR countered with a criminal complaint for qualified theft against Gerodias. The labor arbiter dismissed Gerodias’s complaint, a decision upheld by the National Labor Relations Commission (NLRC).

Gerodias then filed a disbarment complaint against Riveral, Atty. Annabel G. Pulvera-Page (the Corporate Secretary), and Atty. Lorena M. Supatan (an associate at Riveral, Pulvera & Associates). He alleged that they conspired to terminate his employment, pointing to conflicting Secretary’s Certificates and Supatan’s receipt of his Position Paper as evidence.

The Integrated Bar of the Philippines (IBP) investigated the complaint and recommended its dismissal, finding no evidence of misconduct or conspiracy. The Supreme Court agreed, emphasizing the need for convincing proof in disciplinary actions against lawyers.

Key quotes from the Court’s decision include:

• “For a charge to justify a disciplinary action against a lawyer, the complainant must present convincing proof to substantiate the charge. Otherwise, the lawyer is presumed innocent.”
• “Mere allegation of conspiracy is not evidence and not equivalent to proof. The burden of proof rests upon the complainant and the case must be established by clear, convincing and satisfactory proof.”

Practical Implications

This ruling underscores the importance of substantiating claims of lawyer misconduct with solid evidence. For businesses and individuals, it highlights the need to understand corporate governance structures and the authority of corporate officers.

When dealing with employment disputes or corporate actions, it is essential to ensure that all actions are properly authorized and documented. This case also serves as a reminder of the potential repercussions of filing baseless legal complaints, which can lead to counteractions by the accused parties.

Key Lessons

• Always gather and present clear, convincing evidence when alleging misconduct.
• Understand the roles and authorities within a corporation to avoid misunderstandings.
• Be cautious about filing legal complaints without substantial proof, as it may lead to further legal challenges.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the Code of Professional Responsibility?

The Code of Professional Responsibility (CPR) is a set of ethical standards that lawyers in the Philippines must follow. It includes rules on honesty, integrity, and professional conduct.

Can a corporate secretary issue multiple certificates?

Yes, if authorized by the corporation’s by-laws or a specific act of the board of directors, a corporate secretary can issue multiple certificates.

What is the burden of proof in disbarment cases?

The burden of proof in disbarment cases lies with the complainant, who must provide clear, convincing, and satisfactory evidence of the alleged misconduct.

How can an employee protect their rights during a disciplinary investigation?

Employees should document all interactions, seek legal advice, and ensure that their rights under labor laws are respected during disciplinary investigations.

What are the potential consequences of filing a baseless disbarment complaint?

Filing a baseless disbarment complaint can lead to legal counteractions by the accused, potentially resulting in further legal and financial consequences for the complainant.

ASG Law specializes in employment and corporate law. Contact us or email hello@asglawpartners.com to schedule a consultation.