The Integration of Allowances into Standardized Salaries: A Key Lesson from Philippine Jurisprudence

Development Bank of the Philippines v. Ronquillo, et al., G.R. No. 204948, September 07, 2020

Imagine a government employee who has worked diligently for years, relying on various allowances to supplement their income. Suddenly, these allowances are discontinued, leaving them in a financial lurch. This scenario played out in the case of Development Bank of the Philippines (DBP) v. Ronquillo, et al., where former employees sought the reinstatement of their Cost of Living Allowance (COLA) and Amelioration Allowance (AA). The central legal question was whether these allowances were integrated into their standardized salaries under Republic Act No. 6758, the Compensation and Position Classification Act of 1989.

In this landmark case, the Supreme Court of the Philippines ruled on the integration of allowances into standardized salaries, affecting countless government employees across the country. The case began with DBP’s decision to discontinue these allowances in 1989, following the passage of RA 6758. The former employees argued that the discontinuation was invalid due to the lack of publication of the implementing rules, while DBP maintained that the allowances were integrated into the employees’ salaries as per the law.

Legal Context: Understanding RA 6758 and the Integration of Allowances

Republic Act No. 6758, known as the Compensation and Position Classification Act of 1989, was enacted to standardize salary rates among government personnel and eliminate multiple allowances and incentive packages. Under Section 12 of RA 6758, all allowances are deemed included in the standardized salary rates, except for specific exclusions such as representation and transportation allowances, clothing and laundry allowances, and hazard pay. The law states:

Section 12. Consolidation of Allowances and Compensation. – All allowances, except for representation and transportation allowances; clothing and laundry allowances; subsistence allowance of marine officers and crew on board government vessels and hospital personnel; hazard pay; allowances of foreign service personnel stationed abroad; and such other additional compensation not otherwise specified herein as may be determined by the DBM, shall be deemed included in the standardized salary rates herein prescribed.

This provision aims to create a uniform compensation system across government agencies. However, the term “all allowances” can be confusing for many employees who may not understand what is included in their standardized salary. For example, COLA, which is meant to cover increases in the cost of living, is not considered an allowance that reimburses expenses incurred in the performance of official duties, and thus, is integrated into the standardized salary.

Case Breakdown: The Journey of DBP v. Ronquillo

The case of DBP v. Ronquillo began with the discontinuation of COLA and AA in 1989, following the implementation of RA 6758. The former employees of DBP, including those who had retired or resigned, sought the reinstatement of these allowances through a petition for mandamus filed in the Regional Trial Court (RTC) of Quezon City. The RTC initially granted the petition for some employees but denied it for those who had availed of the Early Retirement Incentive Program (ERIP).

On appeal, the Court of Appeals (CA) modified the RTC’s decision, ruling that even those who had availed of ERIP were entitled to COLA and AA. The CA reasoned that these allowances were not integrated into the employees’ salaries and that quitclaims did not necessarily waive their claims. However, the Supreme Court reversed the CA’s decision, stating:

“Under R.A. No. 6758, the COLA, as well as the AA, has been integrated into the standardized salary rates of government workers.”

The Supreme Court further clarified that the nullification of the Department of Budget and Management’s Corporate Compensation Circular No. 10 (CCC No. 10) due to lack of publication did not affect the validity of RA 6758. The Court emphasized:

“The nullity of DBM-CCC No. 10, will not affect the validity of R.A. No. 6758. It is a cardinal rule in statutory construction that statutory provisions control the rules and regulations which may be issued pursuant thereto.”

The procedural journey of this case involved multiple court levels, starting from the RTC, moving to the CA, and finally reaching the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court’s decision was based on the principle of stare decisis et non quieta movere, where established points of law are followed in subsequent cases.

Practical Implications: Navigating Allowances and Standardized Salaries

The Supreme Court’s ruling in DBP v. Ronquillo has significant implications for government employees and agencies. It reaffirms that allowances such as COLA and AA are integrated into standardized salaries, meaning employees cannot claim these allowances separately. This ruling affects similar cases where employees seek the reinstatement of discontinued allowances.

For businesses and government agencies, it is crucial to understand the integration of allowances into salaries to avoid legal disputes. Employees should be aware that certain allowances are part of their standardized salary and cannot be claimed separately. Here are some key lessons:

• Understand the provisions of RA 6758 and how they apply to your compensation.
• Be aware that certain allowances, like COLA, are integrated into your standardized salary.
• Seek legal advice if you believe your allowances have been wrongly discontinued.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the Compensation and Position Classification Act of 1989?

The Compensation and Position Classification Act of 1989, or RA 6758, is a law that standardizes salary rates among government personnel and consolidates various allowances into these rates.

What allowances are integrated into standardized salaries?

Under RA 6758, all allowances are integrated into standardized salaries, except for specific exclusions like representation and transportation allowances, clothing and laundry allowances, and hazard pay.

Can I claim COLA and AA separately from my standardized salary?

No, according to the Supreme Court’s ruling in DBP v. Ronquillo, COLA and AA are integrated into the standardized salary and cannot be claimed separately.

What should I do if my allowances are discontinued?

If your allowances are discontinued, consult with a legal professional to understand your rights under RA 6758 and any relevant court decisions.

How does the nullification of CCC No. 10 affect my allowances?

The nullification of CCC No. 10 due to lack of publication does not affect the validity of RA 6758. Allowances are still integrated into standardized salaries as per the law.

ASG Law specializes in employment law and government compensation issues. Contact us or email hello@asglawpartners.com to schedule a consultation.