Can a School Terminate an Employee Based on Updated Qualification Standards? Understanding Due Process

G.R. No. 113597, February 13, 1996

Imagine a teacher dedicated to their profession for decades, suddenly facing termination because of updated qualification standards. This scenario highlights the complexities of employment law in the Philippines, particularly concerning private schools. The case of Geslani vs. National Labor Relations Commission delves into the crucial balance between an employer’s prerogative to set qualification standards and an employee’s right to due process. Heidi Geslani, a long-time teacher at Agno Valley College, found herself in this predicament when the school terminated her employment as Head of the Pre-Elementary and Elementary Department, citing her lack of qualifications under the newly implemented 1992 Manual of Regulations for Private Schools. The central legal question is whether the school acted lawfully in terminating her based on standards not in effect at the time of her appointment, and whether proper procedure was followed.

Legal Context: Balancing Employer Prerogative and Employee Rights

Philippine labor law recognizes the employer’s right to manage its business, including setting qualification standards for its employees. This prerogative is not absolute, however. It must be exercised in good faith and with due regard for the employee’s rights, particularly the right to security of tenure and due process. The Labor Code of the Philippines emphasizes the importance of just cause and procedural due process in termination cases.

Article 294 [279] of the Labor Code states: “Security of Tenure. – In cases of regular employment, the employer shall not terminate the services of an employee except for a just cause or when authorized by law. An employee who is unjustly dismissed from work shall be entitled to reinstatement without loss of seniority rights and other privileges or benefits and to his full backwages, inclusive of allowances, and to his other benefits or their monetary equivalent computed from the time his compensation was withheld from him up to the time of his actual reinstatement.”

This provision underscores the fundamental principle that employees cannot be arbitrarily dismissed. The employer must demonstrate a valid reason for the termination, and the employee must be given a fair opportunity to be heard.

For example, imagine a company updating its technology and requiring all employees to undergo training. If an employee refuses to participate and subsequently fails to meet the new performance standards, the employer may have just cause for termination, provided that due process is observed.

Case Breakdown: Geslani vs. NLRC

Heidi Geslani began her career at Agno Valley College in 1958. She steadily rose through the ranks and, in 1991, was appointed Head of the Pre-Elementary and Elementary Department. However, in 1992, the school’s Board of Directors terminated her employment, citing a lack of administrative skills and qualifications as department head, particularly under the new 1992 Manual of Regulations for Private Schools.

Here’s a breakdown of the case’s procedural journey:

• October 12, 1992: Geslani files a complaint for illegal dismissal with the Labor Arbiter, seeking reinstatement, backwages, and damages.
• Labor Arbiter rules in favor of Geslani, ordering her reinstatement.
• Agno Valley College appeals to the National Labor Relations Commission (NLRC).
• August 3, 1993: NLRC modifies the Labor Arbiter’s decision, upholding the school’s right to dismiss Geslani due to her failure to meet the qualification standards of the 1992 Manual but awards her one month salary and separation pay for lack of due process.
• Both parties file motions for reconsideration.
• December 20, 1993: NLRC amends its decision, reducing the separation pay.
• Geslani petitions the Supreme Court.

The Supreme Court focused on two key issues: whether the school could apply the 1992 Manual retroactively and whether Geslani was afforded due process.

The Court quoted La Sallette of Santiago, Inc. vs. National Labor Relations Commission, stating that teachers appointed as department heads do not normally acquire a second status of permanency. Also, the Court emphasized the importance of due process in termination cases, stating, “It is settled that the twin requirements of due process, i.e., notice and hearing are mandatory and constitute a sine qua non for the valid dismissal of an employee.”

Despite finding that Geslani’s lack of a master’s degree warranted her termination as Department Head, the Supreme Court ultimately affirmed the NLRC’s decision, emphasizing the school’s failure to observe due process.

Practical Implications: What Employers and Employees Need to Know

This case underscores the importance of clear, consistently applied qualification standards and the necessity of following due process in termination cases. Employers in the Philippines, especially private schools, must ensure that their qualification standards are aligned with current regulations and are communicated clearly to employees.

Moreover, employers must meticulously follow the requirements of due process, including providing written notice of the charges against the employee and affording them a fair opportunity to be heard. Failure to do so can result in significant penalties, even if there is a valid reason for termination.

Key Lessons:

• Qualification standards should be clearly defined and consistently applied.
• Updated standards should be implemented prospectively, not retroactively.
• Due process, including notice and hearing, is essential in all termination cases.
• Employers have the right to manage their business, but this right is not absolute.

Frequently Asked Questions

Q: Can an employer terminate an employee simply because they don’t meet new qualification standards?

A: Not without following due process. The employer must provide notice and an opportunity for the employee to address the concerns. Retroactive application of new standards is generally disfavored.

Q: What constitutes due process in a termination case?

A: Due process requires that the employee be given written notice of the charges against them and an opportunity to be heard and defend themselves.

Q: What happens if an employer fails to follow due process?

A: The employee may be entitled to compensation, such as backwages and separation pay, even if the termination was for a valid reason.

Q: Can an employee be terminated for lack of confidence?

A: Lack of confidence can be a valid ground for termination, but it must be based on reasonable grounds and not on mere suspicion or conjecture. Due process must still be observed.

Q: How are back wages calculated in an illegal dismissal case?

A: Back wages are typically calculated from the time the employee was illegally dismissed until the time of reinstatement, including allowances and other benefits.

Q: What is separation pay and when is an employee entitled to it?

A: Separation pay is a form of compensation given to employees who are terminated for authorized causes, such as redundancy or retrenchment, or in some cases, when reinstatement is no longer feasible due to strained relations.

Q: What manual of regulations should private schools follow for qualification standards?

A: Private schools should adhere to the most current Manual of Regulations for Private Schools, but should apply the regulations prospectively, not retroactively, unless explicitly provided by law.

Q: Can an employee waive their right to due process?

A: While an employee can enter into a settlement agreement, waivers of due process rights are generally scrutinized to ensure they are voluntary and made with full understanding of the consequences.

ASG Law specializes in labor law and employment disputes. Contact us or email hello@asglawpartners.com to schedule a consultation.