Regular vs. Project Employee: Security of Tenure and Illegal Dismissal in the Philippines

Determining Regular Employment: Protecting Employee Rights Against Illegal Dismissal

TLDR: This case clarifies the distinction between regular and project employees in the Philippines, emphasizing that continuous employment performing necessary tasks for the business establishes regular employment, regardless of contracts stating otherwise. Illegal dismissal occurs when a regular employee is terminated without just cause and due process, entitling them to reinstatement and back wages.

G.R. No. 118695, April 22, 1998

Introduction

Imagine losing your job unexpectedly, not because of poor performance, but because your employer claims your project is over. This is the reality for many Filipino workers, highlighting the critical importance of understanding employment status and protection against illegal dismissal. This case, Cebu Engineering and Development Company, Inc. vs. National Labor Relations Commission and Jaime Perez, delves into the nuances of regular vs. project employment, emphasizing the rights of employees to security of tenure and due process.

Jaime Perez, initially hired as a clerk, was terminated under the premise of project completion. However, the core legal question revolves around whether Perez was a regular employee entitled to protection against unjust dismissal, or merely a project employee whose employment lawfully ended with the project’s conclusion.

Legal Context: Regular vs. Project Employment in the Philippines

Philippine labor law distinguishes between different types of employment, most notably regular and project employment. This distinction is crucial because regular employees enjoy greater job security than project employees.

Article 295 of the Labor Code (formerly Article 280) defines regular employment:

“An employee is deemed to be regular where he has been engaged to perform activities which are usually necessary or desirable in the usual business or trade of the employer, except where the employment has been fixed for a specific project or undertaking the completion or termination of which has been determined at the time of the engagement of the employee…”

A project employee, on the other hand, is hired for a specific project, and their employment is coterminous with that project. However, employers cannot simply label employees as “project employees” to circumvent labor laws. The Supreme Court has consistently held that the nature of the work performed, rather than the employment contract’s label, determines the employment status.

Key to understanding this distinction is the concept of “security of tenure.” Regular employees can only be terminated for just cause and after due process, meaning they are entitled to written notices and a fair opportunity to be heard. Just causes for termination are outlined in the Labor Code and typically involve serious misconduct, willful disobedience, or gross negligence.

Case Breakdown: The Story of Jaime Perez

Jaime Perez was hired by Cebu Engineering and Development Company (CEDCO) in November 1991 as a clerk. He was initially assigned to the Metro Cebu Development Project (MCDP) II and later reassigned to MCDP III. A pivotal incident occurred when Perez refused to drive an engineer, citing company policy and vehicle rental restrictions. This refusal led to a confrontation and ultimately, a notice of recall and termination.

Here’s a breakdown of the legal proceedings:

Labor Arbiter: Initially ruled Perez was not a regular employee but awarded back wages for the period between termination and project completion, finding the dismissal groundless.

NLRC Appeal: Reversed the Labor Arbiter’s decision, declaring Perez a regular employee, affirming the illegal dismissal, and ordering reinstatement with full back wages until actual reinstatement. The NLRC also stipulated separation pay if reinstatement was impossible.

Supreme Court: CEDCO appealed to the Supreme Court, arguing that Perez was a project employee, his dismissal was justified, and the NLRC exceeded its jurisdiction.

The Supreme Court sided with Perez, emphasizing that his work as a clerk was necessary and desirable to CEDCO’s business. The court highlighted a crucial piece of evidence, a memorandum instructing Perez to adhere to project rules while remaining a responsible member of CEDCO, indicating his role extended beyond a specific project.

“What determines the regularity of one’s employment is whether he was engaged to perform activities which are necessary and desirable in the usual business or trade of the employer,” the Court stated.

The Court also noted the lack of due process in Perez’s termination, stating:

“[S]uch dismissal must be coupled with due process which requires the employer to furnish the worker or employee sought to be dismissed with two (2) written notices…”

CEDCO’s failure to provide these notices further solidified the finding of illegal dismissal.

Practical Implications: Protecting Your Rights as an Employee

This case underscores the importance of understanding your rights as an employee in the Philippines. Employers cannot simply label employees as “project employees” to avoid the obligations associated with regular employment. Continuous employment, performing tasks vital to the business, often indicates regular employment, regardless of contractual stipulations.

Key Lessons:

Assess Your Role: Determine if your work is necessary for the company’s core operations.

Document Everything: Keep records of your employment history, contracts, and any communications regarding your job status.

Know Your Rights: Familiarize yourself with the legal requirements for termination, including the two-notice rule.

For businesses, this case serves as a reminder to properly classify employees based on the nature of their work and to adhere strictly to due process requirements when terminating employment. Failure to do so can result in costly legal battles and significant financial liabilities.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

Q: What is the difference between a regular employee and a project employee?

A: A regular employee performs tasks necessary and desirable for the company’s usual business, while a project employee is hired for a specific project with a predetermined completion date.

Q: What constitutes illegal dismissal?

A: Illegal dismissal occurs when an employee is terminated without just cause (a valid reason under the Labor Code) and without due process (proper notices and opportunity to be heard).

Q: What is the two-notice rule?

A: The two-notice rule requires employers to provide a written notice of the grounds for dismissal and a subsequent notice informing the employee of the decision to terminate their employment.

Q: What remedies are available to an illegally dismissed employee?

A: Illegally dismissed employees are typically entitled to reinstatement to their former position, full back wages from the date of dismissal until reinstatement, and potentially separation pay if reinstatement is not feasible.

Q: Can an employer simply declare an employee a

ASG Law