When Can a Project Employee Claim Illegal Dismissal? Understanding Security of Tenure

TLDR: This case clarifies that even project employees in the Philippines have rights and can claim illegal dismissal if terminated without just cause before the completion of their project phase. Employers bear the burden of proving valid termination and compliance with due process.

G.R. No. 121582, October 16, 1997

Introduction

Imagine being hired for a construction project, diligently working your part, and suddenly being let go before your phase is even complete. Can that happen? Is that legal? In the Philippines, labor law protects workers, even those hired for specific projects. This case, Southern Cotabato Development and Construction, Inc. vs. National Labor Relations Commission, delves into the rights of project employees and what constitutes illegal dismissal, offering crucial insights for both employers and employees in the construction industry and beyond.

The case revolves around a group of employees hired for a road construction project who claimed they were illegally dismissed. The Supreme Court’s decision sheds light on the employer’s burden of proof and the employee’s right to security of tenure, even within the context of project-based employment.

Legal Context: Project Employees and Security of Tenure

Philippine labor law recognizes different types of employment, including project employment. A project employee is hired for a specific project or undertaking, and their employment is usually coterminous with the completion of that project. However, this doesn’t mean they have no rights. The right to security of tenure is enshrined in the Constitution.

The Labor Code of the Philippines, specifically Article 279, reinforces this right:

“In cases of regular employment, the employer shall not terminate the services of an employee except for a just cause or when authorized by this Title. An employee who is unjustly dismissed from work shall be entitled to reinstatement without loss of seniority rights and other privileges and to his full backwages, inclusive of allowances, and to his other benefits or their monetary equivalent computed from the time his compensation was withheld from him up to the time of his actual reinstatement.”

While Article 279 speaks directly to ‘regular employment’, the Supreme Court has consistently ruled that project employees are entitled to security of tenure for the duration of their project. Employers must still demonstrate just cause for termination before the project’s completion.

Policy Instruction No. 20 further clarifies the rights of project employees, stating that they are not entitled to termination pay if terminated due to project completion. However, it also emphasizes the requirement of reporting terminations to the Public Employment Office.

Case Breakdown: SODECO vs. NLRC

Southern Cotabato Development and Construction, Inc. (SODECO) hired several employees for a road construction project. These employees, working as watchmen, laborers, survey aides, and carpenters, alleged they were dismissed after asking for salary increases. They filed a case for illegal dismissal.

Here’s a breakdown of the case’s journey:

• Initial Complaint: The employees filed a complaint with the Regional Arbitration Branch of the NLRC, claiming illegal dismissal and seeking reinstatement with backwages and damages.
• Labor Arbiter’s Decision: The Labor Arbiter ruled that the employees were project employees and not illegally dismissed, giving credence to the employer’s payroll sheets. However, some watchmen were awarded premium pay.
• NLRC Appeal: The employees appealed to the NLRC, arguing that the Labor Arbiter erred in dismissing the claims of those who didn’t testify.
• NLRC Decision: The NLRC reversed the Labor Arbiter’s decision, finding that the employer failed to prove just cause for the dismissals. The NLRC ordered the employer to pay the employees’ salaries until the completion of the project.
• Supreme Court Petition: SODECO filed a petition for certiorari with the Supreme Court, arguing that the NLRC committed grave abuse of discretion.

The Supreme Court ultimately ruled that the NLRC was correct in finding illegal dismissal. The Court emphasized the employer’s burden of proving just cause and compliance with due process.

The Court stated:

“It is settled that the burden of proving that an employee was dismissed with just cause rests upon the employer. In respect of project employees, the employer bears the same burden if the former are dismissed before the completion of the project, or of the phases thereof for which their services were contracted.”

The Court also noted the lack of evidence presented by the employer to support their claim that the employees were terminated due to the completion of their respective project phases. The Court stated:

“However, petitioners failed to present even copies of these documents; accordingly, no credible evidence supported their claim of completion of the phases of the project for which private respondents were employed, and petitioners have only themselves to blame.”

Practical Implications: What This Means for Employers and Employees

This case reinforces the importance of proper documentation and due process in terminating project employees. Employers cannot simply dismiss project employees without just cause before the completion of their project phase. They must provide evidence to support their reasons for termination.

For employees, it highlights their right to security of tenure, even as project-based workers. They should be aware of their rights and seek legal advice if they believe they have been illegally dismissed.

Key Lessons

• Burden of Proof: Employers bear the burden of proving just cause for terminating project employees before project completion.
• Documentation is Key: Maintain detailed records of project phases, employee contracts, and reasons for termination.
• Due Process: Even project employees are entitled to due process before termination.
• Report Terminations: Comply with Policy Instruction No. 20 by reporting terminations to the Public Employment Office.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

Q: What is a project employee?

A: A project employee is hired for a specific project or undertaking, and their employment is usually coterminous with the completion of that project.

Q: Can a project employee be dismissed before the project is completed?

A: Yes, but only for just cause, and the employer bears the burden of proving that just cause.

Q: What constitutes just cause for dismissing a project employee?

A: Just causes are similar to those for regular employees and can include serious misconduct, willful disobedience, gross and habitual neglect of duties, fraud or breach of trust, or commission of a crime or offense.

Q: What happens if a project employee is illegally dismissed?

A: They are entitled to reinstatement with back wages from the time of dismissal until the completion of the project phase they were assigned to.

Q: What kind of documentation should employers keep for project employees?

A: Employers should keep detailed records of project phases, employee contracts, reasons for termination, and proof of compliance with due process requirements.

Q: Is notice required before terminating a project employee?

A: Yes, notice and an opportunity to be heard are generally required, especially if the termination is before the completion of the project phase and is not due to project completion itself.

Q: Where can I report a termination of a project employee?

A: Terminations should be reported to the nearest Public Employment Office for statistical purposes, as required by Policy Instruction No. 20.

ASG Law specializes in Labor Law. Contact us or email hello@asglawpartners.com to schedule a consultation.