Work Environment Can Trigger Mental Illness: A Landmark Ruling on Seafarers’ Disability Benefits

Wilhelmsen Smith Bell Manning, Inc., Golar Management UK, Ltd. and/or Emmanuel De Vera v. Boneres P. Vencer, G.R. No. 235730, March 17, 2021

Imagine the daunting reality of being at sea, isolated and vulnerable, only to find that your work environment is not just challenging but detrimental to your mental health. This was the harrowing experience of Boneres P. Vencer, a seafarer whose battle with schizophrenia led to a pivotal Supreme Court decision in the Philippines. The central question in this case was whether Vencer’s schizophrenia, a condition not typically linked to work, could be considered work-related and thus compensable under the law.

Vencer’s journey began with a standard employment contract as an able seaman aboard the vessel ‘Golar Grand.’ However, his tenure was marred by alleged bullying and death threats from fellow crew members, which he claimed triggered his schizophrenia. The case traversed through various levels of the Philippine judicial system, ultimately reaching the Supreme Court, which had to determine if his mental illness was indeed work-related and if he was entitled to disability benefits.

Legal Context: Understanding Disability Benefits and Work-Relatedness

In the Philippines, the entitlement of seafarers to disability benefits is governed by a combination of medical findings, contractual agreements, and statutory provisions. The 2010 Philippine Overseas Employment Administration-Standard Employment Contract (POEA-SEC) plays a crucial role, as it is deemed incorporated into every seafarer’s employment contract. Under Section 20(A) of the POEA-SEC, a disability is compensable if it is work-related and occurred during the term of employment.

Schizophrenia, however, is not listed as an occupational disease under Section 32-A of the POEA-SEC. This creates a challenge because the law presumes non-listed diseases to be work-related, but this presumption is disputable. The seafarer must provide substantial evidence that the work conditions caused or at least increased the risk of contracting the disease.

The relevant legal principle here is the concept of ‘work-connection,’ which does not require a direct causal relationship but rather a reasonable connection between the work and the illness. This is encapsulated in the Supreme Court’s ruling in Cabuyoc v. Inter-Orient Navigation Shipmanagement, Inc., where it was held that a seafarer’s schizophrenia could be compensable if it resulted from the demands of shipboard employment and harsh treatment on board.

Case Breakdown: From Bullying to the Supreme Court

Boneres P. Vencer joined the ‘Golar Grand’ in September 2013, after passing a pre-employment medical examination (PEME) and being declared fit to work. However, his time on the vessel was far from smooth. Vencer alleged that he was subjected to relentless bullying and even received death threats from fellow crew members, which he claimed led to his mental breakdown.

In June 2014, Vencer was reported missing from his duties, and a search revealed that he had attacked two crew members with a hammer, believing they intended to harm him. He was subsequently detained on the vessel until his repatriation to Manila, where he was diagnosed with schizophrenia.

The procedural journey of Vencer’s case began with a favorable decision from the Labor Arbiter, who awarded him total and permanent disability benefits. However, the National Labor Relations Commission (NLRC) reversed this decision, arguing that Vencer’s schizophrenia was not work-related. Vencer then appealed to the Court of Appeals, which reinstated the Labor Arbiter’s ruling, finding a reasonable connection between his work environment and his mental illness.

The Supreme Court, in its final ruling, upheld the Court of Appeals’ decision. The Court emphasized the importance of the work-connection principle, stating, “Probability, not certainty, is the touchstone in disability compensation proceedings.” It also noted that Vencer’s mental illness manifested during his employment and was likely triggered by the stressful and hostile work environment.

Another critical aspect was the medical evidence. The company-designated physicians had declared Vencer’s schizophrenia as permanent, with a disability grading of Grade 1, which supported his claim for total and permanent disability benefits. The Supreme Court further validated the applicability of the Collective Bargaining Agreement (CBA) to Vencer’s case, as it was incorporated into his employment contract.

Practical Implications: Navigating Future Claims

This ruling sets a significant precedent for seafarers and employers alike. It underscores the importance of considering the work environment’s impact on mental health, even for conditions not traditionally viewed as occupational diseases. Employers must be vigilant in ensuring a safe and supportive work environment, particularly in high-stress settings like seafaring.

For seafarers, this decision highlights the necessity of documenting any workplace incidents that may affect their health. It also emphasizes the importance of seeking medical evaluation and maintaining records that can support claims of work-related illnesses.

Key Lessons:

• Work environment can significantly impact mental health, and such impacts may be compensable under the law.
• Seafarers should document any instances of workplace harassment or stress that could contribute to their health issues.
• Employers must address and mitigate workplace stressors to prevent potential legal liabilities.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is considered a work-related illness for seafarers?

A work-related illness for seafarers is one that is either listed as an occupational disease under the POEA-SEC or can be reasonably connected to the seafarer’s work environment or duties.

Can mental health conditions be considered work-related?

Yes, mental health conditions can be considered work-related if there is substantial evidence showing a reasonable connection between the work environment and the onset or aggravation of the condition.

What should seafarers do if they believe their illness is work-related?

Seafarers should document any workplace incidents or stressors that may have contributed to their illness and seek a medical evaluation to support their claim.

How does the POEA-SEC affect disability claims?

The POEA-SEC provides the framework for determining the compensability of disabilities, including the presumption that non-listed illnesses are work-related unless proven otherwise by the employer.

What are the implications of this ruling for employers?

Employers must ensure a safe and supportive work environment, as failure to do so may lead to compensable claims for mental health conditions triggered by workplace stressors.

Can the CBA affect disability benefits?

Yes, if a CBA is incorporated into the employment contract, its provisions on disability benefits can apply, potentially increasing the benefits available to the seafarer.

ASG Law specializes in labor and employment law. Contact us or email hello@asglawpartners.com to schedule a consultation.