Long Absence Can Indicate Psychological Incapacity in Marriage

G.R. No. 242362, April 17, 2024

Can a spouse’s prolonged absence from the marital home be a factor in proving psychological incapacity? The Supreme Court, in this recent case, sheds light on how seemingly separate behaviors can, when viewed together, paint a picture of a person fundamentally unable to fulfill marital obligations. This ruling offers hope to those trapped in marriages where a spouse’s actions, though not explicitly a mental disorder, demonstrate a deep-seated inability to commit to the marriage.

Introduction

Imagine being abandoned by your spouse for decades, left to raise children alone, while they seemingly build new lives with others. While infidelity and abandonment are painful, can they also point to a deeper issue: a psychological incapacity that existed even at the time of marriage? This is the question at the heart of Leonora O. Dela Cruz-Lanuza v. Alfredo M. Lanuza, Jr. The Supreme Court grapples with whether a husband’s long absence, coupled with other behaviors, constitutes sufficient evidence to declare a marriage void due to psychological incapacity.

Leonora sought to annul her marriage to Alfredo, claiming both lack of a valid marriage license and psychological incapacity. The trial court denied her petition, and the Court of Appeals dismissed her appeal on procedural grounds. The Supreme Court, however, took a closer look at the substantive issues.

Legal Context: Article 36 and Psychological Incapacity

Article 36 of the Family Code of the Philippines is the cornerstone of annulment cases based on psychological incapacity. It states:

A marriage contracted by any party who, at the time of the celebration, was psychologically incapacitated to comply with the essential marital obligations of marriage, shall likewise be void even if such incapacity becomes manifest only after its solemnization.

Key to understanding Article 36 is the concept of “essential marital obligations.” These are the duties and responsibilities that come with marriage, such as mutual love, respect, fidelity, support, and cohabitation. Psychological incapacity isn’t simply about incompatibility or marital difficulties. It refers to a deep-seated, permanent inability to understand and fulfill these essential obligations.

The landmark case of Santos v. Court of Appeals set the initial guidelines for interpreting Article 36, emphasizing that psychological incapacity must be grave, incurable, and existing at the time of the marriage. However, subsequent cases like Tan-Andal v. Andal have clarified that psychological incapacity is a legal, not a medical, concept. While expert testimony can be helpful, it’s not strictly required. The focus is on demonstrating a spouse’s enduring personality structure that makes compliance with marital obligations impossible.

For example, consider a hypothetical scenario: A man, seemingly normal during courtship, consistently avoids intimacy, refuses to discuss finances, and spends all his free time away from his wife after marriage. These behaviors, if proven to stem from a pre-existing, deep-seated personality issue, could potentially support a claim of psychological incapacity.

Case Breakdown: Leonora’s Struggle for Annulment

The story of Leonora and Alfredo unfolds over several years:

• 1984: Leonora and Alfredo marry.
• Early Years: Initially, the marriage appears smooth.
• Later Years: Alfredo begins staying out late, neglecting his family, engaging in affairs, and treating Leonora as a mere housemate.
• 1994: Leonora and Alfredo separate. Alfredo allegedly marries another woman, leading to a bigamy complaint (later archived).
• 2000: Alfredo reportedly marries again.
• Legal Battle: Leonora files for annulment based on lack of a marriage license and psychological incapacity.

Leonora presented evidence of Alfredo’s subsequent marriages and the testimony of a clinical psychologist, Noel Ison, who diagnosed Alfredo with narcissistic personality disorder with borderline traits. Ison based his assessment on interviews with Leonora, her sister, and her daughter, as Alfredo refused to participate.

The Regional Trial Court denied Leonora’s petition, questioning the evidence of subsequent marriages and the psychologist’s conclusions. The Court of Appeals then dismissed Leonora’s appeal because she used the wrong procedure, filing a Petition for Review instead of a Notice of Appeal.

The Supreme Court acknowledged the procedural error but decided to address the substantive issue. The Court emphasized the importance of considering the totality of evidence:

Unjustified absence from the marital home for decades may be considered as part of the totality of evidence that a person is psychologically incapacitated to comply with the essential obligations of marriage.

The Court found that Alfredo’s actions – abandoning his family, failing to provide support, and repeatedly marrying other women – demonstrated a clear disregard for his marital obligations. The Court also gave weight to the psychologist’s testimony, noting that it is acceptable to rely on collateral information when the subject refuses to be evaluated.

Ultimately, the Supreme Court reversed the lower courts’ decisions and declared the marriage void, concluding that Leonora had presented sufficient evidence to establish Alfredo’s psychological incapacity.

Practical Implications: What This Means for You

This case reinforces the idea that psychological incapacity is not limited to clinical diagnoses. It highlights that a pattern of behavior, including prolonged absence and blatant disregard for marital duties, can be indicative of a deeper, pre-existing inability to fulfill marital obligations.

For individuals seeking annulment based on psychological incapacity, this ruling offers a glimmer of hope. It suggests that even in the absence of direct psychiatric evaluation of the respondent, the court can consider other evidence, such as the testimony of family members and the respondent’s actions throughout the marriage, in determining whether psychological incapacity exists.

Key Lessons

• Totality of Evidence: Courts will consider all available evidence, not just medical diagnoses.
• Prolonged Absence: Long-term abandonment can be a significant factor.
• Collateral Information: Testimony from family and friends can be crucial.

Frequently Asked Questions

What exactly is psychological incapacity under Philippine law?

Psychological incapacity refers to a person’s deep-seated inability to understand and comply with the essential obligations of marriage, such as love, respect, fidelity, and support. It must exist at the time of the marriage and stem from an enduring aspect of their personality.

Does this mean any marital problem can be grounds for annulment?

No. Simple incompatibility, marital difficulties, or occasional lapses in judgment are not enough. Psychological incapacity must be grave, permanent, and pre-existing.

Do I need a psychologist’s report to prove psychological incapacity?

While a psychological evaluation can be helpful, it is not strictly required. The court can consider other evidence, such as the testimony of family and friends, to determine whether psychological incapacity exists.

What if my spouse refuses to be evaluated by a psychologist?

The court can still consider testimony from other sources, such as family members and friends, to assess your spouse’s psychological state. This case confirms that collateral information is valuable.

What if my spouse’s behavior only became problematic after we got married?

The psychological incapacity must exist at the time of the marriage, but it can manifest itself later. The key is to show that the root cause of the behavior existed before the marriage.

Is it possible to get an annulment even if my spouse seems “normal”?

Yes, if you can demonstrate that they have a deep-seated, pre-existing inability to fulfill the essential obligations of marriage, even if they appear outwardly functional.

What kind of evidence should I gather to support my case?

Gather any evidence that demonstrates your spouse’s behavior and its impact on the marriage. This could include testimony from family and friends, documents, and any other relevant information.

ASG Law specializes in Family Law. Contact us or email hello@asglawpartners.com to schedule a consultation.