The High Stakes of a Demurrer: Understanding When to Present Your Defense

Edmundo Quebral vs. Court of Appeals and Union Refinery Corporation, G.R. No. 101941, January 25, 1996

Imagine being sued for a debt you believe isn’t yours. The plaintiff presents their case, and you feel confident they haven’t proven your liability. Do you risk presenting your own evidence, or do you challenge the plaintiff’s case directly? This is the dilemma presented by a demurrer to evidence, a legal maneuver with potentially high rewards – and devastating consequences.

This case, Edmundo Quebral vs. Court of Appeals and Union Refinery Corporation, revolves around the repercussions of filing a demurrer to evidence and losing on appeal. It highlights the importance of understanding procedural rules and the risks involved in foregoing the opportunity to present one’s own defense.

The Legal Backdrop: Demurrer to Evidence Explained

A demurrer to evidence is a motion made by the defendant after the plaintiff has presented their evidence. Essentially, the defendant argues that the plaintiff’s evidence is insufficient to establish a right to relief. If granted by the court, the case is dismissed. However, there’s a catch.

Rule 35, Section 1 of the Revised Rules of Court clearly outlines the gamble: “After plaintiff has completed the presentation of his evidence, the defendant without waiving his right to offer evidence in the event the motion is not granted, may move for a dismissal on the ground that upon the facts and the law the plaintiff has shown no right to relief. However, if the motion is granted and the order of dismissal is reversed on appeal, the movant loses his right to present evidence in his behalf.”

In simpler terms, if the trial court grants the demurrer and dismisses the case, but an appellate court reverses that decision, the defendant is no longer allowed to present their own evidence. The appellate court will render judgment based solely on the plaintiff’s evidence. The defendant essentially waives their right to defend themselves.

Example: A small business is sued for breach of contract. After the plaintiff presents its case, the business owner, feeling the plaintiff’s evidence is weak, files a demurrer. The trial court grants the demurrer, but the appellate court reverses, finding the plaintiff presented sufficient evidence. Because the business owner filed a demurrer, they cannot now present their own evidence to defend against the breach of contract claim.

Quebral vs. Union Refinery: A Case of Misplaced Confidence

Edmundo Quebral was sued along with Higidio Gay-ya, Jr. by Union Refinery Corporation for unpaid oil products. Union Refinery alleged that Quebral and Gay-ya, doing business as Taurus Commercial, defrauded them by misrepresenting sales to third parties.

After Union Refinery presented its evidence, Quebral filed a demurrer, arguing that the evidence was insufficient to hold him liable. The trial court agreed and dismissed the case against Quebral. However, Union Refinery appealed, and the Court of Appeals reversed the trial court’s decision.

The Court of Appeals highlighted several key pieces of evidence that Quebral failed to adequately address:

• Quebral’s admission in his answer to certain allegations in the complaint.
• A letter written by Quebral introducing Gay-ya as his representative to Union Refinery.
• The Deputy Sheriff’s report that Quebral had promised to settle his obligations

According to the Court of Appeals:

“Defendant Quebral also denied in his answer knowledge of or consent to the transactions represented by the unpaid Sales Invoices Exhs. ‘C’ and ‘D’ dated October 8, and 22, 1984, respectively, claiming that it was only his defaulting co-defendant Higidio B. Gay-ya, Jr. who transacted said sales with plaintiff-appellant corporation. And Quebral later claimed in his demurrer, which the lower court sustained, that plain-tiff-appellant’s evidence had failed to show that he knew of and was equally liable with Gay-ya for the value of the unpaid sales invoices…”

Because Quebral had filed a demurrer, he was barred from presenting his own evidence to refute these points. The Supreme Court upheld the Court of Appeals’ decision, emphasizing the risk inherent in filing a demurrer to evidence.

“Pursuant to the aforequoted provisions of Rule 35, if the defendant’s motion for judgment on demurrer to evidence is granted and the order of dismissal is reversed on appeal, judgment is rendered in favor of the adverse party because the movant loses his right to present evidence.”

Practical Implications: Key Lessons for Litigants

This case serves as a crucial reminder of the strategic considerations involved in litigation. Filing a demurrer to evidence can be a calculated risk, but it must be approached with caution and a thorough understanding of the potential consequences. Here are some key takeaways:

Key Lessons:

• Assess the Strength of the Plaintiff’s Case: Before filing a demurrer, carefully evaluate the strength of the plaintiff’s evidence. Are there significant gaps or weaknesses?
• Understand the Risk: Recognize that if the demurrer is granted but reversed on appeal, you lose the opportunity to present your own defense.
• Consider Alternative Strategies: Explore other options, such as presenting your own evidence and then arguing your case in closing arguments.
• Consult with Experienced Counsel: Seek advice from a qualified attorney who can assess your situation and help you make the best strategic decision.

Hypothetical Example: A contractor is sued for defective workmanship. After the homeowner presents their case, the contractor believes the evidence of defects is weak. Before filing a demurrer, the contractor should carefully consider the risk. If the demurrer is reversed on appeal, they cannot present their own evidence showing the work was not defective or that the defects were caused by something else. If the contractor believes they have a strong defense, it might be better to present their own evidence and argue their case fully.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

Q: What is a demurrer to evidence?

A: It is a motion filed by the defendant after the plaintiff presents their evidence, arguing that the plaintiff has not presented enough evidence to prove their case.

Q: What happens if a demurrer to evidence is granted?

A: The case is dismissed in favor of the defendant.

Q: What is the risk of filing a demurrer to evidence?

A: If the trial court grants the demurrer, but an appellate court reverses that decision, the defendant loses the right to present their own evidence.

Q: When should I file a demurrer to evidence?

A: Only when you are confident that the plaintiff’s evidence is so weak that no reasonable person could find in their favor.

Q: What are the alternatives to filing a demurrer to evidence?

A: You can present your own evidence and argue your case in closing arguments, or file other appropriate motions.

Q: Can I appeal if my demurrer to evidence is denied?

A: Yes, but you will have to present your evidence first. You can raise the denial of the demurrer as an error on appeal after the trial is completed.

Q: What if I file a demurrer to evidence, and it is denied. What will happen to my case?

A: If your demurrer to evidence is denied, you retain the right to present your evidence and continue with your defense.

ASG Law specializes in civil litigation. Contact us or email hello@asglawpartners.com to schedule a consultation.