Protecting the Protectors: Implementing the Judiciary Marshals Act

A.M. No. 24-04-09-SC, August 20, 2024

Imagine a world where judges can deliver justice without fear, where court personnel can work without threats, and where the sanctity of the courtroom is always preserved. This is the vision behind the Judiciary Marshals Act (Republic Act No. 11691) and its Implementing Rules and Regulations (IRR). But what exactly does this law entail, and how will it impact the Philippine justice system?

The Judiciary Marshals Act aims to create a dedicated security force under the Supreme Court’s control to protect members of the Judiciary, court personnel, and court properties. The recent Supreme Court Resolution approves the IRR, detailing how this security force will operate and what powers it will wield. This initiative addresses the alarming rise in violence against judges and other court personnel, ensuring they can perform their duties without fear or favor.

The Imperative for Judicial Security

The Philippines has witnessed a disturbing trend of violence against members of the Judiciary. Judges have been murdered, threatened, and intimidated, creating an environment of fear that undermines the administration of justice. The Judiciary Marshals Act is a direct response to this crisis. It acknowledges that an independent and impartial Judiciary is impossible when judges and court personnel are under constant threat.

To understand the importance of this Act, consider the constitutional principle of separation of powers. An independent Judiciary is crucial to check the power of the Executive and Legislative branches. However, this independence is compromised when judges are vulnerable to external pressures. The Judiciary Marshals Act seeks to fortify this independence by providing a dedicated security force.

Key to this protection is Section 2 of Republic Act No. 11691, which states it is the declared policy of the State to “ensure the safety and security of the members of the Judiciary, judicial personnel, and court assets…in order for the Judiciary to function independently and impartially in upholding the rule of law and in preserving the rights and guarantees granted by the Constitution.”

Unveiling the Judiciary Marshals Act: Powers and Functions

The Office of the Judiciary Marshals is not just another security agency. It’s a specialized force designed to protect the Judiciary’s unique needs. Here’s a breakdown of its key powers and functions:

• Protection and Security: Ensuring the safety of judges, court personnel, and their families, as well as court properties.
• Threat Assessments: Identifying and mitigating potential threats to the Judiciary, coordinating with other law enforcement agencies.
• Investigation: Investigating crimes against members of the Judiciary and allegations of irregularities committed by court personnel.
• Assistance in Writs and Orders: Assisting in implementing lawful writs and orders, making arrests, and conducting property seizures.
• Asset Management: Assisting in managing and disposing of seized, frozen, or forfeited assets.

Imagine a judge receiving death threats due to a controversial case. The Judiciary Marshals can conduct a threat assessment, provide personal security, and coordinate with the police to investigate the source of the threats.

The act details that the Judiciary Marshals have concurrent jurisdiction with other law enforcement agencies in investigating crimes within its mandate, giving them the necessary authority to act swiftly and effectively.

The Supreme Court’s Resolution: A Deep Dive

The Supreme Court’s Resolution approving the IRR is a pivotal step in operationalizing the Judiciary Marshals Act. Let’s break down the key points:

• Control and Supervision: The Office of the Judiciary Marshals is under the Supreme Court’s control and supervision, ensuring its independence and accountability.
• Role of the Office of the Court Administrator (OCA): The OCA assists in the supervision of the Office of the Judiciary Marshals, handling administrative needs and coordinating with other agencies.
• Implementing Rules: The IRR provides detailed guidelines on the powers, functions, and responsibilities of the Office of the Judiciary Marshals, as well as its organizational structure and personnel qualifications.

Justice Zalameda emphasized the critical role of the Judiciary in upholding the rule of law, stating that “the members of the Judiciary must be free from any threat that may prevent them from exercising their functions.” The creation of the Judiciary Marshals is a direct response to ensure that freedom.

One notable aspect of the resolution is the establishment of the Judiciary Marshals Academy. This academy will be responsible for training and developing marshals, ensuring they possess the necessary skills and expertise to perform their duties effectively. The training program is expected to include areas such as protective service training, legal training, court security, and firearms proficiency.

The organizational structure includes the following line offices: (1) Judicial Security and Operations Division; (2) Investigation and Intelligence Division; (3) Legal Division, and (4) Digital Forensic Service.

Practical Implications and Actionable Advice

The Judiciary Marshals Act and its IRR have far-reaching implications for the Philippine justice system. Here’s what you need to know:

• Enhanced Security: Judges and court personnel can expect increased security measures, reducing their vulnerability to threats and violence.
• Independent Investigations: The Office of the Judiciary Marshals can conduct independent investigations into crimes against the Judiciary, ensuring impartiality and thoroughness.
• Improved Asset Management: The Act provides a framework for managing and disposing of seized assets, increasing transparency and accountability.

Key Lessons:

• The Judiciary Marshals Act is a significant step towards safeguarding the independence and impartiality of the Philippine Judiciary.
• The Act provides a dedicated security force to protect judges, court personnel, and court properties.
• The IRR provides detailed guidelines on the powers, functions, and responsibilities of the Office of the Judiciary Marshals.

For lawyers, this means understanding the new protocols for requesting assistance from the Judiciary Marshals in cases involving threats to judges or court personnel. For court administrators, it means preparing for the implementation of new security measures and coordinating with the Office of the Judiciary Marshals.

Frequently Asked Questions

Q: Who are the primary beneficiaries of the Judiciary Marshals Act?

A: The primary beneficiaries are members of the Judiciary, court officials and judicial personnel, and their families. The Act also indirectly benefits the public by ensuring an independent and impartial justice system.

Q: How will the Office of the Judiciary Marshals coordinate with other law enforcement agencies?

A: The Office of the Judiciary Marshals may request assistance from and coordinate with other law enforcement agencies, such as the PNP, AFP, and NBI, upon the directive or prior approval of the Supreme Court, through the Chief Justice, and for compelling reasons.

Q: What kind of training will Judiciary Marshals receive?

A: Marshals will undergo continuous training and education to ensure they maintain their capabilities and improve their skills, knowledge, and expertise in performing their mandates. Training areas include protective service, legal training, court security, and firearms proficiency.

Q: What is the role of the Judiciary Marshals Academy?

A: The Academy will serve as a training school, offering seminars, workshops, short courses, and other programs to enhance the skills and knowledge of marshals.

Q: How does this Act affect the existing security personnel in the Judiciary?

A: Incumbent security staff and personnel employed by the Supreme Court and other courts will be given preference in the recruitment of marshals, provided they undergo and pass the required training and selection process.

Q: What powers of investigation do the Judiciary Marshals have?

A: When authorized by the Supreme Court, the Office of the Judiciary Marshals may (a) issue a subpoena for the appearance of any person before it; (b) apply for a search warrant before any court of law; (c) take and require sworn statements from any person summoned; (d) administer oaths; (e) have access to all public records; and (f) file complaints before the Office of the Ombudsman, the Department of Justice (DOJ), or the city or provincial prosecutors.

ASG Law specializes in criminal law, civil litigation, and administrative law. Contact us or email hello@asglawpartners.com to schedule a consultation.