Proving Zero-Rated Sales: A Key to Successful Tax Refund Claims

Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Deutsche Knowledge Services Pte. Ltd., G.R. No. 234445, July 15, 2020

Imagine a multinational company operating in the Philippines, diligently paying its taxes, yet facing challenges in reclaiming what it believes it’s rightfully owed. This scenario isn’t just hypothetical; it’s the reality faced by Deutsche Knowledge Services Pte. Ltd. (DKS), a regional operating headquarters (ROHQ) of a Singapore-based multinational. The crux of their issue? Proving that their sales to foreign affiliates were zero-rated, thereby entitling them to a significant tax refund.

The case of Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Deutsche Knowledge Services Pte. Ltd. delves into the intricacies of tax refund claims, particularly focusing on the proof required to substantiate zero-rated sales. At its heart, the case raises a pivotal question: How can a company ensure it meets the stringent requirements for a successful tax refund claim?

Understanding the Legal Framework

The National Internal Revenue Code of 1997 (Tax Code) and Revenue Regulations No. 16-05 set the stage for tax refund claims. Section 112 of the Tax Code allows VAT-registered entities to claim a refund or tax credit for excess input VAT attributable to zero-rated sales within two years after the taxable quarter. However, the claimant must satisfy four key requisites:

• The taxpayer must be VAT-registered.
• The sales must be zero-rated or effectively zero-rated.
• The claim must be filed within two years after the taxable quarter.
• The creditable input tax must be attributable to the zero-rated sales.

Zero-rated sales, as defined under Section 108(B)(2) of the Tax Code, involve services rendered to non-resident foreign corporations (NRFCs) engaged in business outside the Philippines, with payments made in acceptable foreign currency. For ROHQs like DKS, proving the NRFC status of their clients is crucial, as they are authorized to serve both local and foreign affiliates.

The Journey of DKS’s Tax Refund Claim

DKS, a VAT-registered ROHQ, filed an application for a tax refund of P33,868,101.19, claiming it as unutilized input VAT from zero-rated sales during the first quarter of 2010. Their claim was based on services rendered to 34 foreign affiliates. However, the journey to securing this refund was fraught with challenges.

The Bureau of Internal Revenue (BIR) did not act on DKS’s administrative claim, prompting DKS to escalate the matter to the Court of Tax Appeals (CTA). The CTA Division partially granted DKS’s claim, reducing it to P14,882,227.02 due to insufficient documentation for some of the claimed input VAT and only recognizing sales to 15 out of the 34 foreign affiliates as zero-rated.

On appeal, the CTA En Banc further reduced the refund to P14,527,282.57, recognizing only 11 affiliates as NRFCs. The Supreme Court ultimately affirmed the CTA En Banc’s decision, emphasizing the importance of proving both components of NRFC status: that the client is a foreign corporation and not engaged in business in the Philippines.

The Court stated, “To be considered as a non-resident foreign corporation doing business outside the Philippines, each entity must be supported, at the very least, by both a certificate of non-registration of corporation/partnership issued by the [SEC] and certificate/articles of foreign incorporation/association.”

Another critical issue was the timeliness of DKS’s judicial claim. The Court clarified that the 120-day period for the CIR to resolve the claim begins once the claimant submits complete documents. DKS’s claim was deemed timely because they had the latitude to determine the completeness of their submissions.

Practical Implications and Key Lessons

This ruling underscores the importance of meticulous documentation and understanding of the legal requirements for tax refund claims. Businesses must ensure they can prove the NRFC status of their clients with both SEC certifications of non-registration and authenticated articles of association or certificates of incorporation.

For companies operating as ROHQs, distinguishing between local and foreign clients is crucial. They must maintain robust records to substantiate their zero-rated sales claims, especially given their authorization to serve both local and foreign entities.

Key Lessons:

• Ensure thorough documentation to prove the NRFC status of clients.
• Understand the procedural timelines and requirements for filing tax refund claims.
• Be prepared to substantiate claims with complete and accurate records.

Frequently Asked Questions

What are zero-rated sales?
Zero-rated sales are sales subject to VAT at a rate of 0%, typically involving services rendered to non-resident foreign corporations engaged in business outside the Philippines.

How can a company prove the NRFC status of its clients?
A company must provide both a certificate of non-registration from the SEC and authenticated articles of association or certificates of incorporation to prove that the client is a foreign corporation not engaged in business in the Philippines.

What happens if a tax refund claim is not acted upon by the BIR?
If the BIR does not act on a tax refund claim within 120 days from the submission of complete documents, the claimant can appeal to the Court of Tax Appeals within 30 days after the 120-day period expires.

Can a company still claim a tax refund if it initially submits incomplete documents?
Yes, but the company must complete its submissions within 30 days after filing the claim, as per Revenue Memorandum Circular No. 49-03.

How does this ruling affect ROHQs?
ROHQs must be diligent in proving the NRFC status of their foreign clients to ensure their zero-rated sales claims are valid, given their ability to serve both local and foreign affiliates.

ASG Law specializes in tax law and corporate compliance. Contact us or email hello@asglawpartners.com to schedule a consultation.